Heinz Aeschbach, M.D.  
Humane Civilization

 Humane
 Civilization

  A Draft Manuscript


   humane-civilization.org home

   

 

 ABOUT THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR

 

 

 

Ethics, Economics and the Future of the World
Abuse & Addiction

Sections:  Abuse and Addiction; Abuse-Addiction Prevention; Abuse-Addiction Treatment; Critique of 12-Step Approach (AA/NA); Opiate Addiction Treatment
updated 4/2012

Abuse and Addiction: 
Summary

Introduction Abuse-Addiction, Definitions and Conceptualization
Conceptualization, Biology of Human Behavior and Ethics
Addiction as Disease or Mental Disorder
Addiction and Psychiatric Disorders - Anorexia  Nervosa

Summary  (updated 4/2012)
   Paradigms used in the study of substance abuse are problematic. Abuse-addiction disorders should be conceptualized as psychological disorders defined by a pattern of self-reinforcing harmful behaviors, associated feelings, thoughts and behaviors, and distorted priorities; they are usually associated with other psychiatric disorders. There are biological correlates and predispositions, but these do not constitute the disorder. The term dependence refers to the physiological adaptation to certain substances, many of which are not addicting. Different drugs have different effects, and correspondingly, self-medication of psychiatric symptoms is often associated with specific drug addictions.
   Drugs do not directly lead to unethical behaviors, but unethical people tend to use alcohol and/or illicit drugs. Unethical behaviors, committed while under the influence of a drug, were previously thought about and vicariously enjoyed. Alcohol then makes it easier to act out unethical fantasies; psychostimulants may worsen risk taking and violence. However, distortions of priorities often leads to unethical decisions. Structured, regular use of addicting drugs, as in heroin maintenance treatment (Switzerland and other European countries), hardly leads to unethical behaviors.
   Addicting substances vary greatly in their adverse effects, and different addictions need different treatment approaches. AA works fairly well for alcoholics but little for opiate addicts. Opiate addiction treatment should usually include methadone or buprenorphine maintenance for at least two years. Methadone maintenance treatment is not a continuation of the addiction and allows, in proper dosage, normal functioning. Side effects include decreased aggression and sex drive. Opiate detoxification has a poor prognosis and is dangerous (high risk of overdose).
   We have overwhelming anecdotal evidence that methadone, even in low dosage, is very effective in the treatment of anorexia nervosa.
   Abuse prevention and treatment should emphasize ethics because 1. abuse is, by definition, unethical; 2. abuse typically rewards and reinforces incompetence and/or negative and unethical thoughts, feelings and behaviors; it slows or prevents emotional growth; 3. if patients start or continue to vicariously enjoy unethical acts, the enjoyment of such fantasies may become a psychological addiction, and if lapsing, particularly if drinking alcohol, patients may act out the unethical fantasies; 4. humans inherently want to be 'good' or 'right'. Particularly adolescents vacillate between being self-centered and idealistic.
   There are major problems in how abuse behaviors, abuse disorders and 'substance dependence' have been defined and conceptualized. Health professionals, politicians and lawyers broadly misunderstand substance use disorders. Clinical implications of misconceptions are pertinent for both treatment and prevention approaches.

Introduction 
   This article describes personal experience and salient anecdotal evidence regarding treatment of opiate addiction-multiple diagnosis patients. Physicians have been persuaded that "evidence based" treatments, following what is demonstrated in prospective double-blind studies, is equivalent to good treatment. We tend to forget that many studies are misleading, very limited in scope and/or poorly designed. It is most important that studies show what does not work, where placebo does as well as the traditional treatment. However, most progress in medicine and the behavioral sciences resulted from clinicians' or researchers' keen observations and intuition. For example, compare progress in obstetrics (The New Yorker, 10/9/2006, Annals of Medicine, "The Score – How childbirth went industrial" by Atul Gawande).

Abuse-Addiction, Definitions and Conceptualization                                                                             updated 4/2012
   Abuse is a behavior that feels good but is known to be bad. "Feeling good" meaning experiencing joy, thrill, "high", or relief of anxiety, anguish, boredom, pain. "Bad" means unethical and/or benefits do not outweigh likely direct and indirect negative consequences to self and others. Abuse behaviors are positively motivated and self-reinforcing, consequently, in addition to the behaviors themselves, associated thoughts, feelings, behaviors and experienced environments are remembered, perceived as positive and later sought. Generally, the patient feels in control and may consider abuse behaviors a calculated risk worth taking. [The large majority of people who start using alcohol and/or illicit addicting drugs do not progress to absue-addiction disorders.]
   Misuse may be defined as inappropriate or illegal self-medication.
   In abuse disorder, the abuse behavior dose not occur in isolation and there is a pattern of abuse and associated behaviors with significant negative consequences. Abuse disorders are a major ethical issue: by definition, abuse is itself unethical, 'cheating' the emotional system and culture, additionally abuse usually reinforces many unethical thoughts and behaviors; these other unethical behaviors, which are also enjoyed, are often more problematic than the substance use itself.
   An addiction disorder is a pattern in which the abuse behavior became one of the patient's first priorities, along with priorities such as being a good parent, spouse and employee or student, living essentially within the laws of one's culture, being essentially safe and healthy.
   Lapse [versus relapse] means, key stimuli combined with remaining craving, lead to impulsive substance use or attempt to find drug; the patient almost immediately regrets having fallen victim to old habituation.
   Relapse refers to not only moving towards abuse-addiction behaviors, but mentally consenting to it. The patient may rationalize that he/she now deserves exceptional use and can handle it. A belief that every lapse is a relapse often is a self-fulfilling prophecy: he/she immediately gives up, believing "once and addict, always an addict – why trying to stop".  Relapsing may be compared with Pierre Abelard's concept of sin (French Medieval theologian-philosopher): he maintained  that the sin of (sexual) wrongdoing consists not in the illicit act, nor even the desire for it, but in mentally consenting to the desire. Craving and lapsing is not the sin, mentally consenting to desire, plans to act and action are.
   Abuse-addiction disorders may be understood to be a lack of emotional strength to follow own ethics and values; the emotional pull of the drug's false good feelings is more powerful than the emotional strength of healthy goals. A patient may drift into addiction when lacking strong goals or feeling worthless and hopeless, but ceases to be an addict when finding a positive goal with strong emotional value, e.g. falling in love, expecting a child, finding a religion. While positively motivated, learned stimuli that are associated with abuse-addiction behaviors weaken, and over following years, the danger of return to abuse behaviors becomes minor unless lapsing thoughts and behaviors maintain the abuse memories.
   Abuse-addiction behaviors are primarily positively motivated, even though fear of withdrawal may contribute to the chronicity of the disorder and/or add a compulsive component. Withdrawal symptoms are not the reason patients stay addicted. Patients usually know that, if they decrease the amount of the abused drug by one third and later taper it further, they would have craving but hardly withdrawal. [Many substances lead to physiological dependence without being addicting and many addicting drugs do not lead to physiological dependence: there is overlap between addiction and dependence but they are not the same.] Generally abuse behaviors are planned, not impulsive, to some degree habitual (i.e. following conditioned responses without much awareness), but generally not compulsive. Obsessive-compulsive behaviors are negatively motivated and hardly enjoyed (usually egodystonic). They unsuccessfully try to alleviate exaggerated and/or irrational fears, e.g. fear of contamination.
   Abuse disorders tend to become addictions, if patients have no good reason to check or stop the abuse pattern, e.g. if patients are confused and lacking goals ("drifting"), if they are very depressed and unable to think positively about their future, if they try to self-medicate psychiatric symptoms, or if they live in a (sub)culture that condones if not encourages the abuse.

Abuse: Consideration of the Biology of Human Behaviors and Ethics                                              updated 4/2012 
   Abuse is about feeling good through behaviors that include ethics violations. Basically, humans feel good from 1. instinct fulfillments, and, closely related, 2. cultural fulfillment, or 3. abusable/addicting drugs.
   Drugs, bypassing any thoughts or actions, feel good as if fulfilling an instincts. When addicted, drug use feels instinctive. They "cheat" nature and culture.

  • Tranquilizers and alcohol make person feel good as if conflicts were resolved, there is peace, one believes to deserve rest.
  • Psychostimulants imitate the (immediate) anticipation of something positive and/or big.
  • Opiates seem to feel nurturing, as if held by family, clan, loved ones.

   Abuse, by  definition, feels good and consequently is self-reinforcing. Preceding and concomitant feelings thoughts and actions are also reinforced and start feeling 'right' and/or good. Abuse-addiction and related behavior are learned patterns that soon feel natural or like part of one's culture. Most people restrain or stop abuse behaviors and do not develop abuse-addiction disorders because of insight, including ethical considerations, and because of positive goals that exclude the abuse behavior.
   Ethics violations are perceived by the abuse patient. Typically,

  • The patient would not recommend his/her behavior to a close relative, friend, or peer, and particularly not to his/her own child.
  • The patient would feel embarrassment, shame and/or guilt discussing the behavior with a true peer who does not display same or similar behaviors and pathology.
  • The patient recognizes that no wise, benevolent friend or counselor would advise him to continue the behavior. If another person is involved, the patient recognizes that friends and relatives of that person would disapprove.
  • The patient has a sense that he/she will sooner or later regret the behavior.

   Virtually all people show some abuse behaviors but most do not progress to abuse disorders and addictions. Often, people become addicted because they have psychiatric disorders that decrease insights and motivation to pursue healthy goals. Much drug abuse starts as attempt to self-medicate. A legitimate pain medication may be recognized to alleviate loneliness and/or psychiatric symptoms.
   Men are more likely than women to abuse drugs and become addicted, and there is usually less psychopathology. Humans have an instinctive propensity toward some irrational behaviors. Particularly males' competing for rank order (and for females) includes an instinctive urge to show off with outlandish behaviors and taking major risks. This instinct may be the reason why some addicts show little other psychopathology and why males are about twice as likely to become addicted than females although females have about twice the rate of anxiety and mood disorders. Women tend to use drugs to self-medicate and generally take much less senseless risks, except when complying with males.

Addiction as a Disease or Medical Disorder 
   The notion that addiction disorders are diseases marked by changes in brain structure and functioning (imaging studies), is not helpful. Addictions may be conceptualized as pathological learning "patients learned something they should never have learned". Any learning that involves new information, emotions and motor skills leads to significant changes in the central nervous system. Learning to ski, play the piano or boxing, becoming sexually active, or going through law school undoubtedly changes the person's brain, and areas that are vital in the learning process may expand in size.
   The Diagnostic Statistical Manual's (DSM  IV and IV R) concepts and criteria for abuse, dependence and impulse disorders appear inadequate and in places inappropriate. The implied close association of substance abuse-addiction disorders and physiological dependence is inaccurate1 and suggests inept treatment2.
   Addiction is commonly considered progressive and often lethal, like a malignant disease. Actually courses of addiction disorders vary greatly; treatment may be crucial but many addicts improve and recover without professional or other interventions. Recovery may be related to life experiences; addiction treatment should include fostering broad learning and maturation3.
   It is also problematic to consider addictions genetically transmitted. Psychiatric disorders are not inherited, though predispositions often are. In the case of propensity to addictions, there are primarily less protective factors, such as personality traits of a planner who wants to feel in control, being sensitive to drug side effects, etc. Many psychiatric conditions may predispose to addictions disorders, e.g. patients with ADHD, mood disorders, PTSD, borderline personality disorder, but probably not antisocial personality disorder(?). Generally, humans have adequate insight to avoid moving from abuse to addictions, but everybody may, in unfavorable circumstances, develop an abuse or addiction disorder. It is easy to get laboratory animals addicted to many types of drugs. In principle, humans are similarly susceptible. Regarding antisocial behaviors: opiate addicts sometimes learn to behave in antisocial ways while becoming addicted. With methadone treatment, most improve rapidly and think more ethically.
   Concerns over medicalizing unethical behaviors have been raised with the fear that psychiatric diagnosis may be used to excuse behaviors. We never need a mental disorder diagnosis to excuse behaviors: scientifically, we must be essentially determinists. [If having free will is part of a person's religious and/or moral thinking, he/she may believe that there is a small "unclaimed" space – science cannot fully explain how animals (and humans) make decisions.] Basically, our behaviors are determined by genes; by previous helpful, neutral and pathological learning; and by the present environment. We should never fool ourselves, believing we could voluntarily commit crimes that contradict our upbringing, nor that we could have acted differently in the past without the hindsight we have now.
   By design, humans are virtually always in conflict with fellow beings, and humans suffer much "normal" physical and mental pain, particularly women. Whether we consider a human being's condition worthy of therapeutic help is a matter of pragmatic compassion, not a response to a judgment as to whether the patient's pain is voluntarily self-inflicted versus due to a disease or accident.
   
Addiction and Psychiatric Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa                                                          updated 3/2012
   Psychiatric disorders are frequent in patients with abuse-addiction disorders, particularly in women.
   Women seeking treatment for opiate addiction often relate major abuse histories and bad experiences with intimate partners. Psychiatrically, we see much depression, anxiety, PTSD, self-injurious behaviors, anorexia nervosa, etc. Generally, times of extreme loneliness appear to cause vulnerability to developing opiate addiction. An interesting observation has been that we admit much less twins than statistically expected (in the age range of our patients, one in 40 people has a twin and the big majority of twins grow up with this close sibling. It appears that having a fraternal or identical twin may decrease the vulnerability towards opioid addiction because phases of extreme loneliness are less likely4.
   Opioid maintenance gives these patients structure and an environment where treatment is possible. It makes the emotional loneliness more tolerable while patients learn to become more socially connected.
   In some patients, we noticed antipsychotic effects of methadone: when slowly tapering methadone, paranoia appears. This effect is dose related.
   We believe to have strong anecdotal evidence that methadone even in low dosage, probably also buprenorphine, rapidly and significantly decreases most or all symptoms of anorexia nervosa, and that symptoms may not return when, after extended time of maintenance treatment, methadone (or buprenorphine) is slowly tapered and withdrawn. I believe that methadone maintenance should be considered as safe and well tolerated treatment of anorexia nervosa if not the treatment of choice. However, further studies are needed.

_______
1  Many nonaddicting substances lead to physical dependence, including seizure, hypertension and nonprescription pain medications, some antidepressants, and high dosage salt intake. People may be dependent on insulin because of food addiction and/or addiction to a physically lazy lifestyle, but they are not addicted to the insulin.
2  The focus on physiological dependence supports the assumption that discontinuation of the drug constitutes successful treatment.
3  The DSM III research summary on course of opioid dependence stated (page 172): " Among those who survive, increased abstinence is found with the passage of years, with final cessation of dependence an average of about nine years after its onset." (I do not know what studies this was based on but it is hardly accurate for most U.S. opiate addicted patients.) It also mentions the excellent prognosis of heroin addicts returning from VietNam. We tapered many patients off methadone and we know of some that they did very well for at least 10 years.
   CDC statistics of incidence of use of alcohol, tobacco and street drugs, based on age, show a steady decline with age (maturity). Valiant described the natural course of alcohol addiction: many alcoholics stop drinking or even return to social drinking without specific treatments. Many smokers stop without professional help or peer/support meetings.
4  A larger survey of our patients is in progress. Our experience has been that much less than one in 40 of last few hundred admissions are twins, and  the last three twins have been very atypical. In one pair (identical, female) both had major depression with the more successful and never addicted twin having completed suicide by hanging; in another (fraternal, males) the patient’s twin brother is reportedly severely schizophrenic with brain damage secondary to suicidal OD [antipsychotic medications].

 

Abuse-Addiction Prevention

   Primary drug abuse prevention includes preventing abuse behaviors, deceasing vulnerabilities and strengthening protective factors. Secondary abuse prevention seeks to avert the development form minor abuse to abuse and addiction disorders. Tertiary abuse prevention is relapse prevention during and following treatment for addiction; it may include preventing or treating secondary addictions, such as food and nicotine addiction while in treatment for alcoholism or opiate addiction.
   Many factors pertain to primary drug abuse prevention. For a healthy development within their society, children need stable attachments and opportunities to learn and practice social skills, including broad empathy and an understanding of cultural values and traditions. Children have inherited temperaments, talents and predispositions, and they may have some lasting problems from early childhood traumas and under-  or over-stimulation in critical periods of development. A major task for children is to learn to compensate for shortcomings and to develop potentials that are beneficial within their societies.
    Children benefit from different gender parental figures, a stable group of peers of different ages and access to natural environments -  these components in the young child's environment are less and less available with yet unknown consequences. Children's natural propensity to exercise their bodies, express themselves artistically and to meditate and contemplate are often suppressed. Major problems in early childhood include a folklore that raises false expectations, e.g. good things happen to good children, bad things happen to bad children; working hard, you will reach your goal and be happy ever after. Western folklore also reinforces black and white thinking, rather than recognizing good and bad, yin and yang, male and female traits in virtually everything. Probably most traumatic is abuse that clashes with cultural expectations, leading to shame, guilt, disgust and horror, a sense of dread, unpredictability and loneliness.
   Accepting and dealing with realities is important from an early age on. Fate is random (no god or guardian angel intervenes personally on a person's behalf); we can only influence our environment and future; we never can control or predict anything. Children may deal with issues in more or less solitary play and social interactions; however, many children handle stresses poorly. It is probably reasonable for children of certain temperaments to rely more on leader figures. Some children benefit from a very structured environment. Dissociation and/or wishing strongly that reality can be changed, should at most be a very temporary response to extreme situations.
   Inability to adjust to micro-  and macro-environment, and/or a mismatch between temperament, individual shortcomings and environment, leads to psychiatric disturbances. Most psychiatric problems considerably increase the probability of youngsters' slipping into abuse-addiction patterns; early and effective treatment is likely to make a significant difference.

   Later, primary, secondary and tertiary abuse prevention focuses on dealing with negative stress, i.e. negative anxiety and depression (most anxiety and stress is mixed or positive), with ethics, positive motivation, and with psychological and psychiatric problems.

  • Approaches in stress management include cognitive therapy, healthy lifestyle, interpersonal therapy that fosters good human relationships (relationships with animals are also helpful), relaxation-meditation techniques (particularly autogenic training) and self-hypnotic techniques.
  • Focus on ethics: humans inherently want to be "good" and/or "right." Particularly adolescents are ambivalent, often not realizing how self-centered they are but, at other times, highly idealistic and keen to be ethical. Abuse is, by definition, unethical. Abuse-addiction not only "cheats" nature and culture, it reinforces incompetence, unethical behaviors, pain, etc. Teaching may stress how abuse-addiction "work against nature", derails healthy developments, reinforces young person's feeling bad, keeping him/her "stuck" in immature state.
  • Regarding cigarette smoking (usually a 'gateway drug'), raising positive motivation is most important. Teaching addresses immediate effects and the ugliness of smoke versus clean breath, clean and natural smelling clothes and hair, etc.  To explain intermediate and long-term health effects: smoking cessation means that the gradual decline of body systems (lungs, blood vessels, heart, taste sense organs, etc.) first rebounds some, then the normal decline is slow as in a nonsmoker with healthy habits. Considering ethics, smokers may be reminded that buying cigarettes pays for the advertising of cigarettes: advertisements targeting children and the most vulnerable people, young Third World women.
  • Particularly in girls, confusion about sex and poor self-image leads to vulnerability towards drug abuse and addiction. Media, other girls and guys incite young girls to become sexually active. Girls may agree to sex in an attempt to ensure a lasting boyfriend relationship, but are dropped after they had intercourse. At least for girls, sex is not an experiment; early sex usually lowers their self-image. Sex is much less rewarding and more dangerous for girls than boys. Sex should be the last step in a courtship. Guys should learn empathy, not exploit insecure girls who foolishly seek sex, and never pressure a girl. Many girls need support regarding their self-image and they should learn to assess when sex is right for them.
  • For adolescent and young adult males, drugs are often part of male risk taking and rebellious acting out against cultural values of parents and teachers. Usually, there is a sense of being in control, able to stop at any time, however, often there are no adequately powerful motivators to stop patterns of abuse. Men need positive goals and their ambitions should be directed. If there are no good role models in their families and schools, school counselors and mental health workers should find mentors and helpful organizations.

_______
1  Sometimes, antidepressant medications are indicated.


Abuse-Addiction Treatment:

   Insight and positive goals are most important in all types of abuse-addiction prevention and treatment. People need a perception of meaning in life, and a sense that abuse behaviors are contrary to personal goals and family and personal culture. (Most people do not get addicted when using abusable drugs because of insight – they recognize that other behaviors are more meaningful, that drugs would soon be in the way.)

   Steps in treatment probably should include the teaching/learning of the following:

-  Patients need an understanding and belief in scientific data concerning the plasticity of the brain or mind. Past does not determine future; many shortcomings can be overcome by new learning and/or be compensated for.
-  Abuse behaviors are learned and cannot truly be unlearned. They change the brain in the same way as complex cultural activities do (e.g. studying law or evolution, military training). Becoming sexually active includes learning that changes the brain. However, there is no inherent necessity to practice what was learned.
-  The naïve brain contains many pathways. Reinforcement from enjoying instinctive actions, cultural fulfillment or drug use, strengthens pathways that lead to the good feeling, making them into "highways", while pruning unused paths. When drug addiction established "superhighways" that lead to the drug use, it takes years of nonuse for "grass, and later bushes, and trees to grow on the highway". Another comparison is snow with frozen parallel tracks: it must snow many times until it is easy and safe to freely ski on that slope. Instincts, cultural behaviors and addictions are reinforced with use, but weaken with nonuse. There is no inherent necessity to be aggressive or acting on sexual instincts, and the longer a person goes without fighting or sex, the less likely he/she will act out, impulsively and/or planned.
-  Patients must understand: abuse is never o.k., it is not a matter of opinion, religion or dominant culture. It is a matter of ethics; abuse diminishes one's humanness.
-  Abuse is unethical because it competes with and 'cheats' nature (social instincts, etc.) and culture (mostly civilizations' adaptations of instincts): abusable drugs feel good 'for no good reason'; addiction is a core disturbance of our emotional-behavioral system.
-  Abuse behaviors reward 'bad' feelings, thoughts and behaviors; it leads to neglect of self and loved ones; addicts learn more destructive rationalizations (people are generally "pseudo-rational", believing that instinctive and cultural behaviors are done for rational reasons).
-  Learning aspect of abuse-addiction include: good feelings or "highs" reinforce "bad" moods, thoughts, behaviors, etc.; all aspects of abuse behavior patterns are reinforced, start to feel natural, etc.
-  Abuse-addiction behaviors halt psycho-social development and positive learning; it leads to regression (reverting to or being stuck in adolescent conflicts).

   In summary: Abuse behaviors are by definition unethical. Abuse means doing something that is 'bad' with the goal to relieve tension, feel a thrill or "get high"; and abuse behaviors generally reward and reinforce bad feelings, thoughts and behaviors. Abuse behaviors are immature (adolescent): selfish, risk taking, rebellious (cultures are correct when seeing alcoholism and drug abuse as bad).
-  If the patient (temporarily) lacks protective mechanisms, e.g. lack of insight and sense of directedness, depression with little appreciation for the future, abuse behaviors tend to become more frequent and grow into psychiatric disorders.
-  Sobriety, abstinence from abuse behaviors is not for the patient, it is for his/her loved ones, including future friends and relatives that are not born yet.
-  Patients typically enter treatment for negative reasons: pressures, fears, etc. The human mind does not respond well to negative factors; cautious behaviors due to negative factors are generally short-lived unless there is an instinctive component, such as fears of snakes or deep water. Patients need to move from primarily negative to primarily positive motivation, mainly through learning, better understanding of human nature (instincts, culture, abuse) and through changing perceptions, thought patterns and values. At the same time, patients should explore and recognize what is positive and negative about abstinence versus use, acknowledging that a drug-free life is often hard (no relief when there is stress and pain), while during addiction, the quality of life is good (excitement and "highs" while dangers and adversities hardly bothersome). The main difference is meaning in life versus lack thereof. This aspect of treatment mainly deals with growth, learning and maturing.
-  Patient must define all misuse/abuse behaviors (that may become addictions). [Social drinking and cigarettes are probably main factor leading to relapse in drug addiction patients.] Any potentially abusive and addictive behaviors may interfere with progress, worsen, and/or lead to relapse after discontinuation of opioid maintenance treatment. Abuse behaviors include many drugs and medications, nicotine, food for stress relief, gambling, inappropriate shopping or sex, etc. Patients should set clear guidelines, e.g. sweets allowed in culturally appropriate situation, as deserts, with guests; coffee not dangerous for person. Patients must find positive motivations to stop them, and, possibly with specific help (e.g. buproprion for nicotine and psychostimulant craving), stop behavior completely before leaving treatment. Particularly groups may be effective in  helping patients gain insights and motivation.
-  12-step models (AA/NA) may be counterproductive. If a belief in a "higher power" seems right to a patient, this "higher power" must not be an external god, a meeting or "whatever"; it has to be the core of his/her being, the part of the human mind that wants to be ethical, in some ways "right" or "good". Religious people may benefit from the Quaker concept of "that of God" or "the Light" being in everybody; focusing on "the inner Light". Advertising an abuse history to strangers is not helpful, abuse histories should be very private, to be revealed to psychotherapists and spouses, possibly adult children and a rare confidant, not friends and distant relatives. Former drug addiction patients must not believe in having a permanent "disease" and being permanently in "recovery", they must not become dependent on meetings, they need to mentally move on, not become professional patients.
-  Lapse versus relapse: Patients should learn to distinguish between impulses, including lapsing feelings, thoughts or behaviors, versus going into unethical fantasies, enjoying them, mentally consenting to them, and, in specific circumstances, executing them. Mentally consenting to thoughts of drug use, thinking it is now o.k. or giving up ("once and addicts-always an addict") is typically the root of a relapse. Patients must assume that lapsing thoughts and actions may occur at any time, even though they usually decrease over time. Lapses are recognized as 'wrong', the person knows that a turn of at least 90 degree is needed; lapses are rarely leading to relapse.
-  Treatment should strengthen motivation for education: academic, artistic, etc. Young people then should recognize how a good education allows them to do what they are interested in and get paid well for it while lack of education forces people to do what they may not like, getting paid poorly.
-  Ethical viewpoints: counselors and teachers should deal honestly with problems in our culture -  laws are wrong in principle and law enforcement is bad in execution, there is no justice (everybody is different, fate is random, same treatment of different individuals is not justice), social political systems are deficient; then move on to pragmatic acknowledgment of what seems to, more or less, work, how the presently unchangeable judicial system functions, how each individual needs to work on improving his/her personal culture to an ethically higher level than present standards, etc.
-  "Stress", meaning negative stress, negative anxiety, conflict, typically translates into drug craving and/or withdrawal thinking. When in conflict the person is uncomfortable and the mind scans what worked in the past for relief. In extreme stress, the person shortly regresses, feeling like an infant, small child, then like and adolescent. Approaches in stress management include cognitive therapy, interpersonal therapy that fosters good human relationships (relationships with animals are also helpful), healthy lifestyle, relaxation-meditation techniques (autogenic training, self-hypnotic techniques, contemplation). Meditation is defined as narrow mental focus, e.g. on breathing alternately through right and left nostril, and non-judgment, i.e. not judging temperature or noises, letting an ache be, etc. Contemplation consists in looking at facts, past, present and probable future, without judging, without guilt, disgust or revenge feelings.
-  Patients may need to understand weight problems since some people revert to psychostimulant abuse when overweight, and foods themselves may become addictions. Hunger means that the body's physiology switches from burning nutrition in the gastrointestinal tract to using glucagon reserves in the liver, then burning fat. Hunger also follows rhythms that a person developed and there are often conditioned reflexes. Biologically, people normally want to eat much to build up reserves when food is available and stress is relatively low. Appetite is suppressed by stress (positive or negative) except when people find easily digested, calory-dense "comfort foods". Weight problems are aggravated by the ready availability of foods to be designed to stimulate appetite (salty, spicy appetizers) or to be eaten on a full stomach (deserts) and generally by calory-dense, overprocessed foods. Frequently feeling hunger is normal but temporary and much of the time, we may acknowledge hunger without acting on it. Focusing on other activities that are positively stressful (physical, exciting to person) allows losing weight. Weight loss due to stress is similarly temporary and usually not a problem.
-  Patients may need to understand chronic intermittent pain which often leads to opiate addiction. Chronic pain is  a misnomer, it is greatly misunderstood: the CNS is designed to tune down and ignore irrelevant continuous or intermittent information, including bad smells and pain stimuli (there is, however, progressive pain e.g. with cancer or rheumatoid arthritis). People with completely rotten teeth eat sweets and become obese. Nursing home patients with miserable backs often smile and walk, carefully, around. Most of the time, people should be able to distract themselves from pain stimuli, forget their disorders and even sleep without pain medication. People have chronic pain when they assume/were convinced that their pain will be persistent, when there is a lack of meaning in their life, and when there is secondary gain. High functioning people without depression learn to tune pain out, may be use self-hypnotic techniques, but hardly ever need narcotics.
-  Treatment is like initiation into true adulthood, a level of maturity, a stage where adolescent behaviors become taboo. For young people, it is normal to at least consider ignoring guidelines, overstepping rules and laws, and adult people, hopefully more cautiously, do the same. However, young people often questioning taboos and/or have not established taboos for themselves, adults should have and obey cultural taboos. (Taboos defined as cultural laws that have been proven over time to be meaningful with no exceptions; if pondered and researched, the result will always be that the taboo is correct. Obviously, they are sometimes overstepped – otherwise nobody would talk about them – not following taboos is an indication of immaturity and/or mental disorder.) Adulthood includes accepting many behaviors, which may be open to question or acceptable to adolescents, into the category of taboos. Most important: suicide, other than in final stage of a terminal illness, is unethical and must be considered taboo; if suicide is considered, relapse becomes much more likely. Other example of taboos in adulthood include physical fighting and other forms of using physical force (e.g. in rape); promiscuous thoughts and behaviors, any sexual behavior with a child or first degree relative. The primary positive motivators are meaning in life, ethics, and a higher standard of personal culture (as opposed to culture at large and drug subculture).
[To explain: guidelines are least important, regulations and laws are usually followed but often overstepped, taboos are considered absolute, to be followed even if no uninvolved person can find out.]
-  Patients need an understanding of human nature including inherent need to be "right" or "good". Normally, humans want their children/next generations to do better, that civilizations develop and become more humane.
-  Patients need to create rationally an image of how they want to be in future.
-  They then are to learn feeling how reaching goal state would be, through meditation, contemplation and visualization. Some aspects of previous life may need to be grieved. Goals may need to be fine-tuned.
-  For changes: self-monitoring (avoiding automatic and thoughtless actions), observing rhythms of high and low tension and danger; doing 'reruns' of situation where one failed, imagining how it would have felt to do 'right' thing; structuring behaviors; changing habits, settings and environments around times of high risks (when behavior anticipated), usually without telling others why routines are changed; etc.
-  Leaning that the more intense a feeling/emotion (craving, anger, manic feeling, attraction to person) the more one has to acknowledge and accept feeling, letting it slowly go, without acting on it, expressing it or talking to others about it; simply staying friendly. Finding reasons for feelings reinforces them. [Craving contagious; when showing bad feelings towards others, there are usually retaliatory feelings; if feeling very good, easily bad promises made or exaggerated expectations raised. Positive feelings and criticisms maybe verbally expressed and discussed after some observation and contemplation.]
-  Patients must address psychiatric and psychosocial issues that lead to vulnerabilities. Virtually all drugs seem to alleviate sense of negative stress, turning anxiety positive or decreasing it. Opiates serve particularly to alleviate sense of loneliness, not being part of family or clan, human relationships lacking meaning. Many or most opiate addicts need work in this area (interpersonal therapy and/or treatment of posttraumatic stress symptoms, exaggerated shyness, etc.)


Critique of 12-Step Approach (AA/NA), and proposed adjustments                                       4/2012

Introduction and general issues:
Specific problems with AA/NA:
Proposed adjustments to 12-step approach:

Introduction and general issues:
In summary, the 12-step community is very helpful to many patients; however, it is not "evidence-based treatment"; it is essentially a religion that needs reformation. Some aspects of the 12-step doctrines appear counter-therapeutic. Some adaptations of the teachings are proposed.
   12-step groups help many people by offering a community of like-minded former addicts who struggle with their abuse thinking, problems with positive motivation to stay drug-free, poor coping skills, etc. The sense of belonging can be healing. Fostering patients' religiosity within this church-like organization is often helpful, particularly if it includes meditative practices. Many people benefit from pursuing a religious culture and finding support by people who profess membership of the religion, even if their lives in no way reflect their professed beliefs.
   The assumption that AA members accept new members in a nonjudgmental way is helpful though unrealistic; people with primitive religiosity judge pantheists and agnostics (and vice versa); and people do not consider different drugs equal. However, attenders of AA meetings may accept and discard any comment and statement and in this way broaden their 'tools' to stay sober and/or process new insights at a later time. This process is possible in any support group and is not specific to AA/NA.
   Within the AA/NA community, members as well as professionals tend to misunderstand the nature of abuse and addiction, seeing it usually as a progressive disease caused by the use of toxic drugs and the physiological reactions to them. It is more helpful to see addiction as a psychological disorder with varied prognosis, often associated with a difficult phase in life, other emotional problems and immaturity. Many people overcome addiction without any counseling, treatment or support group attendance. The political decision by the DSM commission (of the American Psychiatric Association) to call addictions 'dependence disorders', was less than helpful. Obviously, humans are dependent on many things: water, calorie, protein, mineral and vitamin intake and also the sense of being part of a clan or community; many medications lead to adaptations, that is, after short-term use, more medication is needed to maintain efficacy and sudden discontinuation leads to an uncomfortable physiological imbalances - however, neither tolerance nor abstinence symptoms occur in certain addiction disorders but are characteristics of physiological dependence. AA members, psychiatrists, psychologists and academic scientists rarely agree on a definition of abuse or addiction disorder, and AA members are particularly prone to consider medication use 'addictions', while they continue smoking with overuse of coffee and/or engage in eating or sexual conduct that others would consider abusive.
   AA must not be considered 'evidence based treatment'; it is always a treatment adjunct in which social support and the patients' prior propensity to religiosity may improve the patients' prognosis. Claiming that the AA teachings are treatment, a specific cause of the improvements, is akin to stating that dictionaries in a household make people literate: religious people seeking support groups of people who want to change are likely to do better than isolated, cynical people, whether they follow Islamic religious texts dealing with alcohol use and ethics or the AA book; similarly, people owning dictionaries correlates with literacy and helps improve literary skills, but buying a dictionary does not give an illiterate person the ability to read. Furthermore, the time investment, promise of recovery and religious talk has benefits comparable to those of faith healers.

Specific problems with AA/NA:
- AA is a religion that demands reformation. A book, written by two alcoholics some 80 years ago, has been revered like a holy text. It offers a religion-based model of alcoholism that is tailored to the founders: affluent white males who basically rationalized continued drinking because they were aware that they had some control over it. [The founders were influence by a patient of the Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Gustav Jung; Jung was not able to help his patient with traditional psychoanalytic therapy and advised him to seek guidance in his religion; focusing on his religion helped him to stop drinking.]
- The concept of being powerless over alcohol or drugs is meaningless: being 'in control' is relative. Scientifically, there is no free will, or at least there is virtually no space for free will. Will is always relative; sober people often do things that are, objectively, "out of control", when 'powerless' concerning their emotions; conversely, worst addicts sometimes chose to seek treatment or suddenly find emotional insights that make them stop the pattern of abuse behaviors. People always feel partly free, and they typically feel freest when following 'spontaneously' an instinct.
- The mandate that patients have to admit powerlessness over the drug and turn control over to a god is unacceptable, even offensive, to the depressed female patient who drinks because her life was out-of-control, and because her religion did not help her when she felt most alone and hopeless. However, since women are more prone to pragmatically comply with their culture and religion, no matter how male chauvinist, many women still seek comfort in AA groups - they may then be helped by the acceptance and support of the group and the changes in their perception of themselves within their communities, not by specific teachings of AA/NA.
- Asking a personal god to intervene in one's life is a primitive religious act; it is not 'spirituality'. If people believe that prayers are responded to by a personal god' s intervention, they are likely to be, sooner or later, disappointed, when loved, good persons have bad luck without their god saving them. People adhering to such primitive religiosity also appear to be oblivious to the extreme 'injustices', with many beautiful children suffering horribly and dying without having reached any meaningful goal, frequently not even a meaningful level of maturity [compare the beautiful article by Frank Bruni, "Rethinking His Religion", NY Times 4/24/2012].
- The 'disease' concept is dangerous and often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. When patients leave our clinic and, after years, relapse, we sometimes hear the explanation "I guess I stopped going to meetings" - these patients have not moved into a new stage in life and adhered to the 'permanent disease' concept. Disease generally refers to damaged tissue that takes time to heal or, due to genetics or later damaged, faulty physiological function. Addiction competes with a healthy use of the mind, it may temporarily alter balances in brain chemistry, but it does not destroy 'the hardware' in a different way than other, undesirable learning. It is not unusual that an emotionally powerful motivator pulls a person out of addiction with no (slow) healing process or any treatment, and some patients fluctuate between patterns of addiction and healthy priorities. It is much more helpful to recognize abuse, addiction and healing as stages in life; the person learned something he/she should never have learned and then may fluctuate for some time between old pre-addiction functioning, addiction patterns, and mature priorities and functioning. Everybody is susceptible to become addicted at times when stress is great and the environment may move people close to the abuse behaviors; and former abuse disorder patients are more likely to become addicted again than people never having had problems with abuse disorders. However, a person who is in some danger of becoming addicted is not suffering from and addiction 'disease'.
- Sponsors and former addicts serving as primary counselors is often problematic. For them, it is very hard to be objective and see the wide variety of problems and needs addicts have, the many ways abuse-addiction disorders develop, etc. Too often, sponsors want to explain to addicts what their problem is, why they got addicted (talking about how they perceive themselves) and what the way of recovery is. Reasons why addictions develop include: too much testosterone (with urge to show that one can get away with stupid, dangerous, counterproductive behaviors), ADD/ADHD with difficulties to ascertain likely future consequences of a behavior, suicidal and parasuicidal thinking that interferes with looking at the future in a positive way, PTSD with sense of absolute loneliness and fear of the future, utter loneliness because of (temporary) anger at all 'loved ones', seeing own culture as collapsed, inability to make sense of one's position and/or inability to make crucial decisions with, consequently, hard to tolerate anxiety. Actually the question is not: why do people who found an abusable drug, continue using it?, but: what gives many people the strength, to stop before they wasted precious time and resources, started hurting their loved ones and overstepped cultural limits? Once found, using drugs feels like an instinct, and we need a strong reason that is supported by our emotions in order not to follow that drive.

Proposed adjustments to 12-step approach:
- Patients may look at abuse patterns like any unethical behavior that has a powerful inherent attraction. As with instincts, following a specific instinct strengthens it and with repetition, an internal rhyme develops where the behavior feels periodically necessary. The longer the behavior was missed, the less powerful a key stimulus is needed to elicit the behavior and the more intensely the person seeks a stimulus (an opportunity to exercise the behavior). Only when frustrating the urge for an extended time will it weaken. However, any lapsing thoughts and behaviors strengthen the urge again. The mind has a tendency to move towards instinctive and addictive behaviors; the closer we come to key stimuli, the more powerful they are. Like with a heavy piece of metal and a large magnet, at some point, while gradually moving closer to it, the magnet is so powerful that we can no longer hold the metal away from the magnet. Mind and body automatically fulfill the instinct or substance use behavior; at that point, the sense of loss-of-control is very real.
- As a model of addiction development, we may consider learning in layers: there is functional or cultural learning, we learn ways of fulfilling instincts in a natural and culturally appropriate way; we also have 'bad' learning, e.g. enjoying instincts out of context including unethical sex, dangerous and aggressive sports, vicarious aggression in computer games, or food abuse; additionally, people learn using substances that feel good as if an instinct were fulfilled.
-  If looking at the concept of a 'higher power', it must be the core of the being, not some god in the universe or anything with symbolic meaning. A 'higher power' may be, as in Quaker tradition 'that of God' in every body, 'the Inner Light'; or in secular thinking, the part of the person that makes the individual social animals part of a larger clan or group. In the folkloristic sense of 'brain', 'heart' and 'gut', the heart, which seeks and gives love, trust and care, would be the higher power.
- The substance of the recovery process consists more in the establishment of a higher personal culture with taboos, than in working the steps per se. Counselors must be careful in working step four. The traumatized and depressed patient does not need guilt, even if symbolic steps to make amends may be helpful. Generally we must accept: the past 'just is', not 'good' or 'bad'. Given the circumstances, the patient did his/her best, but because of learning and changed personal culture, he/she will not, nor can, repeat the past.
- A diligent review of ethical principles may be most helpful, with the recognition that abuse, by definition, is unethical. [compare:  Natural Ethics, chapter 3.4] Abuse-addiction is like a devil's contract, as in many fairy tails [particularly the tales collected by the brothers Grimm]; the abuse feels good, the loved ones suffer first, eventually the negative consequences also reach the abuser-addict.
- When having reached psychological changes, the patient should consider him/herself 'cured' but in some danger of re-addiction, quantitatively but not qualitatively different from a person who may be in danger to become, first time in his life, an alcoholic at a later age. Patients should keep their addiction history secret towards most people, while able to assertively clarify that they do not use legal and/or illegal addicting drugs that may be offered.
- While in AA/NA meetings, the issue of patients being on slow-onset, long-acting drugs such as methadone or time release alprazolam, should not be mentioned. However, high dosage patients should consider to taper their dosage as soon as they reach a certain level of stability, and, for most patients, treatment with such medications should be a phase of life, more than a few months, but not decades.

Opiate Addiction Treatment

1. Short summary of conclusions of literature and overwhelming anecdotal evidence I found in my work with opiate addiction-multiple diagnosis patients:
-  Opioid abuse and addiction are mental (psychiatric) disorders that tend to be progressive if there is not good, comprehensive treatment and/or if the environment is very difficult. However, some patients improve without major intervention, some go through multiple episodes of abuse-addiction to opiates and/or other drugs.
-  Treatment generally requires years (opioid maintenance or possibly long-term placement in therapeutic community), but the prognosis with long-term treatment is often good. Unnecessarily long opioid maintenance is a concern (some patients feel trapped and dependent on methadone, afraid of withdrawing). Other concerns are overmedication with multiple medications (including tranquilizers and muscle relaxants), and non-treatment of other psychiatric conditions.
-  For most opiate addicted patients, opioid maintenance is the treatment of choice (methadone is the 'gold standard'2, buprenorphine is in most patients inferior3).
-  Detoxification is not treatment; it is very dangerous. There is overwhelming anecdotal evidence that many patients, following withdrawal in a hospital or jail, overdose lethally and/or destabilize, leading to major deterioration in many areas. Detoxification does not address the psychological addiction.
-  Detoxification disrupts all functions that have been maintained during the addiction; children may need foster care, careers are disrupted, etc.
-  Patients who leave treatment prematurely have high rates of relapses, move to other addictions (particularly alcoholism), morbidity and deaths that are directly related to drug abuse, worsening of psychiatric conditions, and suicides.
-  Methadone maintenance treatment has multiple psychiatric benefits, including decrease in aggression and sexual acting out (due to decreased testosterone level) some antidepressant effect (serotonergic) and, in some patients, significant antipsychotic effects. Methadone, in proper dosage, does not interfere with normal feeling and thinking; intellectual functions are not impaired.
-  In many patients, methadone treats the addiction but patients continue some substance abuse (usually at least ten times less than when addicted). Patients who are not yet willing or ready to address abuse patterns may function quite well but would relapse into addiction if withdrawn from treatment.
-  Proponents of alcoholics and narcotics anonymous (AA/NA) usually claim that opioid treatment programs (OTPs) make patients more 'addicted', that methadone is merely a legal continuation of the addiction. Obviously we must distinguish between medication that makes the patient more functional versus abused drugs that interfere with functioning. However, some OTP patients feel dependent and stay primarily on methadone because they fear withdrawal and/or an erroneous belief in an endorphin deficiency. In additions, many OTP patients function poorly due to use of, tranquilizers, muscle relaxants and/or alcohol. OTPs should utilize treatment approaches that allow many patients to taper off methadone with an excellent prognosis.
-  Addiction professionals must not go along with the 12-steppers' "terminal disease-permanent recovery" model. Neither should we propagate the "endorphin deficiency" model. OTPs must compete with a better model. Addiction is not a progressive, terminal illness and opiate addicts do not have an endorphin deficiency.
-  OTPs must not run like franchise-style non-medical "programs", with by non-clinician administrators conceived policies and procedures; over-regulated, and with contrived treatment plans and treatment models.
-  OTPs must not look for psychiatric clinics to treat their patients: they treat psychiatric patients, they are psychiatric clinics and they should treat all psychiatric problems of their multiple-diagnosis patients (what can be treated in outpatient settings).
-  OTPs must treat pain in their patients.
-  Patients dosages must be highly individualized in a very wide range (about 20 -  300mg). Stabilization dosages vary greatly over time. Of concern is that the higher the dose range, the more patients use/abuse benzodiazepines (hardly a cause-effect relationship).
_______
1  Raw statistics indicate that most patients who leave methadone treatment relapse. However, if we look at raw data of patients leaving methadone, there is, according to our anecdotal data from patients, a very poor prognosis for four reasons 1. the patient leaves for non-therapeutic reasons (e.g. pressure by relatives, law enforcement and other and agencies, lack of financial resources/support, move, shortly jailed), 2. the conditions of patients are such that there is a poor prognosis (e.g. still nicotine, alcohol and/or benzodiazepine use, psychiatric problems that were not properly treated), 3. inflexible, relatively rapid tapers when patients want to leave treatment (or are assumed to be rehabilitated and ready); the patients may then perceives withdrawal symptoms and returns mentally back to abuse-addiction thinking, 4. the patient embraces the "disease/permanent recovery model" but gets tired of attending meetings; he/she then feels defenseless when, unexpectedly, drugs become available; the relapse is a self-fulfilled prophecy (I often ask: "Why do you think you relapsed?" some patients answer: "I guess because I stopped going to meetings.")
   Our own survey of many patients who properly withdrew and, years later, relapsed due to medical prescription of pain medications (mostly after surgery) indicated: they had good quality of life off all drugs/medications; they were glad that they tapered off methadone even though they eventually relapsed.  They returned to treatment before there were major problems due to their re-addiction (i.e. not using prescription medications properly and/or using shortly heroin again).
2   Medical withdrawal (detoxification) is, for most patients, an obsolete treatment. It may be compared to treating tuberculosis with surgery.
3   Much has been written about the 'partial agonist' action of buprenorphine making it less addicting. Obviously, no opioid is ever used as full agonist: fully agonizing endorphin receptors leads to immediate coma and death. Buprenorphine is weaker and longer acting with consequently more drawn-out withdrawal symptoms, similar to low dosage LAAM [no longer available].

Broad Benefits of Widespread Use of Opioid Maintenance Treatment:
   Methadone and, to a much lesser degree, other opioid maintenance treatment has been extremely successful in my native Switzerland, decreasing the deleterious consequences of heroin addiction and minimizing contagion. With most addicts in treatment, new addiction dropped in the nineties to one fifth.
     In the USA, the biggest problems with opioid maintenance treatment are:

  • misconceptions and public attitude discouraging opioid maintenance treatment,
  • lack of knowledge by professionals (including physicians, supervisors and clinicians in a broad range of state agencies) and in the health care profession itself
  • inadequate access to and poor quality of clinics.

Short Summary of Literature Regarding Detoxification from Opioid Dependence
Large Italian study by Marina Davoli et al., (Article first published online: 19 Nov. 2007 DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02025.x):
10,454 heroin users who entered some form of treatment were followed, in the average, about one year. Most patients were much or all of the study period in long-term treatment including opioid maintenance.
While in treatment, mortality rate was 0.1%/year; out of treatment (after short-term treatment), mortality rate was 1.1%/year; in the month after leaving treatment, the risk of lethal overdose was 2.3%, in subsequent months, the risk of lethal overdose was 0.7%. Independent of treatment type, treatment was protective of overdose deaths. [Since mortality rate is highest in the first few days of entering opioid maintenance treatment (sometimes suicidal or parasuicidal), long-term opiate overdose risk is even less than 0.1%/year. Other studies document that length of treatment, independent of type of treatment, is the best predictor of a good prognosis.]
British study by John Strang et al., published in the British Medical Journal 2003; 326 : 959 (5/3/2003):
In follow-up of 137 opiate addiction inpatient admissions (28 day program), only 37 completed treatment, of these three died of overdose within four months. 57 left prematurely after detox; of these two patients relapsed and died within a year of causes other than overdose. 43 left during detox, none of these died during the one year follow-up.
British study
by M Gossop et al., published in The British Journal of Psychiatry 1989; 154: 348-353, titled: Lapse, Relapse and Survival among Opiate Addicts after Treatment, A Prospective Follow-up Study
In this study of 80 young opiate detoxification patients (inpatient, 21 day methadone), there were, on six month follow-up, many opiate abstinent patients, but two had died of overdose shortly after discharge.
Canadian study by Benedikt Fischer et al., published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003 171 (3) (8/3/2004), titled "Determinants of overdose incidents among illicit opioid users in 5 Canadian cities":
Drug treatment in the past 12 months was one of three predictors of opiate overdoses. The other two were homelessness and non-injection use of hydromorphone in the past 30 days.
Irish study by Bobby P. Smyth, published in The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005) 187: 360-365
Retrospective study involving 149 consecutive admissions with primary diagnosis opiate dependence in Dublin Ireland 1995-96. Median age of patients: 23 years, median duration of opiate abuse 4 years, 60% living with parents, 5% with other relatives; 6wk. program including 10 day methadone detoxification, with long-term follow-up treatment (few stayed long in treatment). 81% completed methadone detoxification but 58% did not complete six weeks treatment (medium 14 days).
Of the 149 patients, 5 died within the study period, and 109 of the remaining 144 completed a follow-up structured interviews 18-42 months (median 29 months) after the treatment episode: 23% were abstinent without methadone maintenance at the time of the interview, 15% used heroin daily, and 57% were in methadone maintenance (no data as to how many patients went to methadone immediately after discharge or later after failed or completed treatment). 50% reported recent misuse of at least one opiate, 43% reported no recent misuse of opiates, (study gives no indication of drug testing, no data on other treatment between discharge and interview).
The paper concludes that "Abstinence remains an attainable goal", and 5 deaths is reportedly the expected ratio of deaths in this population, however it is the expected ratio in untreated heroin addicts: the treatment did not decrease the high death rate in young opiate addicts. This indicates that the treatment helped some (and many sought appropriate, safer treatment), but several patients appear to have died due to the treatment.

[Some studies seem to indicate that many patients enter some form of treatment when they seem ready to move into a new phase in life and consequently do relatively well. Some studies show good results for decreased use of opiates without evaluating alcohol or other drug misuse.
I am not aware of a U. S. study, but the overwhelming anecdotal evidence, as reported by patients and relatives, confirms the conclusions of these studies.]


2. Treatment admissions and treatment adherence; treatment levels, transfers to other treatment facilities:

   The goal of OTP treatment is ready admission and treatment adherence until the patient is safe to get off opioid maintenance. Opiate addicts who seek treatment are emergencies and must never be put on a waiting list. They are patients who need medical-psychiatric care as urgently as a patient with out-of control diabetes or in acute psychosis. Withholding access to treatment may also be compared with having thieves and violent offenders put on a waiting list to serve their prison sentences. Interim maintenance is CSAT's answer to the problem, however, few, if any OTPs that should utilized this treatment actually offer it. Furthermore, there are still widespread funding and treatment criteria that lead to hardly justifiable expenses, offering a few patients supposedly superior treatment while keeping most addicts on long waiting lists. Damages to the communities, including costs of emergency room visits and hospitalization, harm to patients' children and other relatives, contagion of addiction to younger people, are hard to underestimate.
   Dropping prematurely out of treatment, premature medical withdrawal, administrative withdrawal and other disruptions of treatment must be avoided whenever possible; they are very dangerous and wasteful: previous treatment gains are lost, dysfunctional behavior patterns that were distant memories are again regularly practiced and compete with all life functions.
   Rather than having two levels of treatment: interim maintenance and comprehensive treatment, multiple levels are needed, including treatment that includes case management, groups and TH privileges (needed for work and to reduce unnecessary travel time and costs), but no individual counseling.

3. Main aspects of treatment and treatment stages include:
3.1 Screening/admission:
   Treatment should start when the patient applies for treatment, no waiting lists, no delay in medical, psychosocial and psychiatric evaluation; the intake is often the beginning of psychotherapy; occasionally a patient has to be referred to an emergency department at time of screening (e.g. for indications of generalized infections and/or possible endocarditis).
   Review of systems, health history, physical examination including V. S., chest auscultation, inspection of skin and check for enlarged and/or tender lymph nodes and dipstick (clinistix) urine analysis are to be performed on day of admission, if possible when patient drops in and applies for treatment. Treatment programs should immediately start comprehensive treatment of severely depressed, PTSD, and other acute multiple diagnosis patients. Private OTPs should never have waiting lists, publicly funded and non-profit OTPs with limited capacity should put patients without pregnancy or major psychiatric disorders into "interim maintenance". If the OTP is not capable to treat a patients' psychiatric conditions, it should have close cooperation with psychotherapists and psychiatrists; referrals should be timely and effective. [Sadly, many mental health professionals are afraid of dealing with OTP patients and they may not understand what treatments are inappropriate; cognitive behavioral therapy, EMDR, sometimes hypnotherapy should be first choice treatments; physicians must consider dangers of certain medications , e.g. compound side effects, (no naltrexone for alcohol craving or bulimia!)]

3.2 Medical treatment of acute withdrawal (approx. first week of treatment).
   In early treatment, patients often need multiple dosages, e.g. receiving first dosage when intake essentially completed and second dose approx. 3 hours later. On following days, patient may receive first dosage at 6 a.m., second and possible third dosages at 9:30 a.m. and 1 p.m.  Patients should receive adequate dosages to treat withdrawal for most of 24 hours. For follow-up dosages, a 4-7-10 or 5-10-15 rule may be used: low dosage if no withdrawal but patient is alert and fears later withdrawal; middle dosage if subjective withdrawal, high dosage if some objective withdrawal.
   To judge indication for same, higher or lower dosage on days 2, 3, 4, and 5, we must consider when and which opioid the patient last used before admission: is the patient expected to be in early, worst or late withdrawal? Did the patient use illicit methadone, buprenorphine or another agonist-antagonist medication? If the patient has not used opioids for over 30 hours and/or if he/she recently used buprenorphine (SUboxone), second or third day dosage may have to be decreased to avoid buildup of methadone serum level (Dilaudid withdrawal is most acute and shortest, most popular pharmaceutical opiates have somewhat slower onset and longer duration of withdrawal than heroin; buprenorphine partly antagonizes methadone for up to three days).

3.3 Time of stabilization of methadone dosage:
This time may include dosage increases when the patient still handles stress poorly. Patients may continue to complain of withdrawal (methadone "not holding"). Obviously, since heroin withdrawal lasts six days, patients have after the first week no longer withdrawal, no matter whether they get placebo, 40mg or 100mg of methadone, but they still have craving and feel stress. Patients must learn that, early in treatment, stress is perceived as craving , and craving leads to psychosomatic withdrawal-like symptoms. Dose decreases often lead to a fear reaction that is perceived as withdrawal.  [If patients ask to go on a blind "detox", patients often complain that the taper is too fast before the first dose decrease went into effect.]

 3.4 Stabilization of all mental and life functions:
   Counselors/case managers, social workers, psychotherapists and psychiatric physician help patients with the following issues, individually and in teaching and therapeutic groups:
-  practicing a healthier lifestyle and learning relaxation, meditation and possibly also self-hypnotic techniques;
-  patients addressing psychosocial, legal and medical problems;
-  patients are to receive and cooperate with effective treatment for psychiatric problems including psychotherapy (EMDR often indicated), psychotropic medications, usually antidepressants, mood stabilizers, possibly antipsychotics, rarely long-acting slow-onset benzodiazepines.
   Often non-pharmacological pain management is indicated. Sometimes patients benefit form TCA or seizure medications for specific pain conditions.
   Patients may benefit from support when dealing with social agencies, school or work, legal issues, etc., but OTP staff should primarily guide and encourage, not make calls for patients. Sometimes patients need help when discriminated against/mistreated and inappropriately referred, e.g. by CPS or drug courts, or when needing special consideration because of ADHD and/or other psychiatric disorders.

3.5 Patients need to deal with specific tasks:
-  Patient must define all misuse/abuse behaviors (that may become addictions).
-  Patients need to perceive abuse behaviors, and life in a broad sense, differently.
-  If patient is benefitting from NA, adjustments are probably needed. The "higher power" must be inside the person. The addiction must be moved into the past and, except for very rare situations, be kept secret.

3.6 For many or most patients, eventual withdrawal from maintenance treatment is indicated.
Many stable patients falsely assume they need continued treatment to maintain abstinence. When more mature, having done well for 1-2 years, patients should decrease methadone or buprenorphine dosage significantly, e.g. to 2/3 dose of methadone or 1/2 of buprenorphine, then test themselves (enjoy more intense perception of nature and art, better bowel and sexual functions, higher pain tolerance). Then they may decrease dosage in further steps, until they feel good on what previously would have been considered a placebo dosage. At that point, discontinuation of maintenance treatment is safe, with an understanding that "in case of lapse-relapse, it is never too early or too late to return to treatment."

3.7 For many or most patients who tapered off opioid maintenance treatment, continued group attendance and some follow-up individual counseling, continuation of psychiatric treatment, etc. is helpful, if not needed, and should be offered by OTP at low fees or no charge. [Former patients tend to be an asset to teaching and counseling groups.] However, follow-up is not meant to be permanent relapse prevention. Patients are informed that they may return at any time: it is never too early or too late to return when the patient feels he/she may benefit from further help.

4. Treatment strategies:
   Strategies, including medication dose levels and offering TH privileges (often exceptions form SAMHSA needed) must be very flexible, adapted to the patients' life circumstances, work and/or studies, psychosocial conditions and emotional readiness to address psychological issues. The therapist may benefit from a problem list that includes all issues that appear problematic (including old traumas which the patient is at the time unwilling to work on or considers resolved). We must never limit counseling to the issues the patient wants to change (most patients are not eager to change sedentary lifestyles, stop certain drugs and junk food addictions, etc., nor do they want to address obvious anxiety issues which they treat with benzodiazepines as prescribed by some MD). The therapists educate and motivate, as much as possible in groups. Rewards for group attendance may be valuable incentives (e.g. unearned TH dosages for convenience, if patient is assessed to be able to safely handle them). Individually, the therapist continues to evaluate the patient and works on all problematic issues as the patient allows and/or shows readiness. Treatment plans are rarely very helpful. Often, the therapist is surprised how the patient changes, how situations change, and how new problems surface. Asking patients to spend time writing an essay as to how they see themselves in six months may bring insights not easily reached in a treatment plan session. Some patients may then spontaneously work towards change. "Pushing" them and/or giving "no progress" evaluations in the next treatment plan session, may have paradoxical consequences.
   In long-term treatment, patients tend to stagnate and resist change for extended times. Group leaders may introduce material that changes the patients' views and motivates them. Progress is usually unpredictable and influenced by many factors OTP staff has no control over and which may never be known.



Return To Psych Articles Main Page        Top of Page


      H. Aeschbach, M.D.:   About the Author